Saturday, 30 October 2010

Slides & Imagery

Today I've been working on my portfolio evidence and writing up the subject of my Powerpoint slides. I have reflected on my preference and rationale for using images in my slides, and also now understand how important the conversion process is to my own understanding of the lecture material.

A couple of weeks ago I blogged about Peter's remarks as he chanced upon my slides - 'how distracting'. A glib remark which I have since agonised about.

I had a chat with Sally about it - she seems to be knowledgeable about all things 'learning'. She told me about learning styles, and how my presentation style would suit some people and not others, and I needed to be aware.

I also talked to Gary about this and his view was the closest to mine that I have yet encountered - he showed me his slides and they were thought provoking and certainly not just reams of bullets. Whew.

I'm sure that's true. So this leaves me thinking:
  • What are the learning styles, and what content should I be including.
  • Do I have to suit all learning types in my class - is that even possible?
  • Students take lots of modules. If visually retarded (OK, harsh!) slides are the norm, is there room for me to carry on doing my own thing?
I need to do some reading around this I think. Not quite sure where to start. Will check out the 2 Phil Race books I have as a starter.

Friday, 29 October 2010

Whispering French

My 9am lecture today was in HLT2 for the first time. This is my 3rd year group - high proportion of international students, in particular a large group of French. They are mainly top up students so have just started at University in the UK in spite of being 3rd years.

In previous lectures and seminars, a group of them had consistently whispered throughout. Talking to Gil about it, she said this was common practice for French students, and felt it was a cultural difference.

Today, in the lecture I noticed the whispering was much worse than usual. There was a hard core of 4 in the middle of the auditorium, two at the front, and another 3 on the right. The overall effect was an almost constant low level murmuring.

When I felt the level had become unacceptable I tried stopping talking and staring pointedly at the people talking. I did this twice but they seemed oblivious. I recalled something Grant had been saying earlier in the week, about feedback from his students when he had failed to control others talking. I realised that I owed it to the other students to try and stop it.

I was a bit annoyed by now. I raised my voice and said that all I could hear was people whispering, and that not only was it distracting for me, but also for the other students, and that I wanted it to stop, and that it was unacceptable. The two girls in front even carried on talking while I was telling them off. I went and stood in front of them and said 'Hello, were you listening? I'd like you to be quiet please.' They both apologised. The talking did stop, but at one point a couple of the group of four appeared to be giggling, and one had his jumper up to his face - looked like he might be talking behind it.

I spoke to David about it - he said he'd never had that problem but Dave had - when they'd talked about it David had suggested that they might be trying to translate what was being said. I thought this an extremely generous (and incorrect) assessment.

Discussing it with Simon, he told me about a time his students had failed to show and failed to do their prep and he had thrown his papers in the air and walked out, after giving some home truths about the amount of money they were wasting for themselves and their families if they couldn't be bothered to do the work. Not sure it's quite that bad! Very dramatic though.

I reflected some more on what happened today, and feel I need to have a strategy ready for next week. First of all, I think the acoustics in the banked auditorium in HLT2 may mean that the whispering sounds much louder than normal, and the behaviour is more obvious to see. Notwithstanding that, it still needs to stop.

I think I have identified the ringleaders. For next week's lesson I will know their names, and use them - so they will know that I know who they are. I am considering trying to have a conversation with the French. Maybe they are indeed unaware of the expected behaviour in the classroom in the UK. I might even apologise for telling them off, and say I now realise that they may be unaware of the difference in classroom environment from what they are used to and it will take a bit of adjustment. I could also ask what they are talking about - is there a reason they feel they need to talk? Do they understand? Am I going too fast? This may be a less adversarial approach. If I have that conversation with them I will have given them every benefit of the doubt.

I might also try and find out whether it is indeed different in University in French - might start by Googling it, and then try and talk to the French tutors in the business school - see if there is a cultural thing.

If all of that doesn't work, I'll start taking it personally!

Maybe I should use this as my critical teaching incident for PGCTHE and see what the others think.

Update: Have spent some time researching this on the internet and came across some good pointers on a bulletin from the Stanford Centre of Teaching & Learning... reproducing Phil Race. Why didn't I think of the books!!! Duh.

Thursday, 28 October 2010

Thrills & Spills

Tomorrow's Consumer - first seminar
Today I took my first seminar group of Tomorrow's consumer students. We watched 10 social marketing ads and then I had them categorise the ads in terms of a matrix I'd shown them in the lecture. I also had them vote on how they had responded to the advertisements.

The last ad I hadn't been able to play at my PC but it worked in the lecture - and was really shocking - made me respond as much as the students. Quite emotional really.

Loads of really good debate - all groups seemed to find the content very easy to talk about. They struggled a bit with the matrix - glad they had to do the exercise since they hadn't fully grasped it from the lecture alone. Makes me realise the level of understanding may sometimes be pretty low - had to explain the difference between Tangible and Intangible... bit of a worry.

Adaptation of Multichoice for Accessibility
Today I made the arrangements for a disabled student for the first time. I called the Access Team and found out what he was entitled to in terms of extra time, and breaks. Gil told me he also needs the questions up on Powerpoint as he can't easily read from a paper, so spent some time prepping that. Seems pretty straightforward. Bit alarmed that the statement of his entitlement hasn't made it's way from the course leader to me. How many other students have disabilities that I am not aware of? Apparently it is sufficient for me to ask them to identify themselves... doesn't really seem adequate to me.

Monday, 25 October 2010

Tests, condoms, chattering & goosebumps

Multichoice test
Devised my first multichoice test today - well let's say adapted. I was pleased to say that out of 40 questions I only had to change 4 - one badly composed, three referring to seminar activity that I had changed. So please to see that I've actually covered the same content that Mark would have gone through.

IAW seminar
I've been using the IAWs in seminar more and more lately - and growing in confidence now. Moving stuff around, grabbing screenshots. I can hear the students remarking upon it and know that they are getting a different experience which is good.

Tomorrow's consumer - big lecture theatre
Biggest lecture to date - was quite excited ahead of this one. Big group, interesting topic. David popped in to my office to warn me about the rowdy back row in room 126. Actually for a big group in the 5-6 slot they were very attentive. There were lots of familiar faces, lots of note taking.



The seat belt video worked well but I think it started too fast - didn't realise the volume was down so low until we were a few seconds in, lost a bit of impact. I have got goosebumps every single time I've watched it - must be 10+ times now. Hope that happened to a few of the students too. Also found great Polish Amnesty International and French safe sex ads. Got through the content a bit too fast, realised in time and slowed it down. Finished in 45 mins but I think everyone was happy with that, it being so late.

Near the end there was a bit of talking on the back row. I stopped, and the other students turned to look at the disturbance, and it stopped. At the end I went up to the back and told the students on the back row that I wanted them to sit at the front next time as they had disturbed my class. They looked sheepish. Not sure if I was too confrontational or not. Probably wouldn't even have made an issue of it if David hadn't drawn my attention to it. See if they turn up next week. Will definitely stop people sitting on the back row in there - David was absolutely right. Should have listened.

Friday, 22 October 2010

Music to my ears

We have Sticky Content!
"I was telling someone about this" - the video I showed them last week & embedded in the Nile site. "There's the one I was looking at - it's good" - the Nile site content.

At last, a tiny hint that my tricky 3rd year top ups are actively engaging with the content.

Virtual Seminar
Mostly out of necessity - everyone keeps telling me it's not a requirement to 'stand and deliver' every hour on the timetable - I have set up a virtual seminar. Over the next 2 weeks I will be delivering an extra 6 hours a week...taking me to 22, so I need to buy some hours.

So I have had a go at setting up groups on Nile, giving each a discussion board. I have started 4 threads on each discussion board. I embedded a tv ad in the first post of each thread, and have asked them to discuss the advert in the context of this week's reading of Jobber. I have also scanned the Jobber chapter and put it on line. This group have been rubbish at reading so far so I really hope this will help them to engage. They have 5 days to blog and if I don't see a post from each of them I'll mark them as absent from the seminar.

I really hope this works - could be fun & a regular. I told the 4.00 class that the more they engage in the activity, the more likely I am to repeat it. They hate staying to 4pm so that's a real incentive!


Bills Eggs
I thought it might be a non-event - but actually, the introduction of a box of eggs really had an impact in the room. First, they were intrigued when I put the box of eggs at the table at the front.... I left them there until 3/4 of the way through. I think keying the code into the website live introduced a little risk that it might not work, and we got into a debate about the value of being able to see Bill's farm. I referred to the box of eggs for the remainder - the impact of the website on my relationship with 'the egg'. Happy with how that went - will use with the first years next week I think.


Thursday, 21 October 2010

Disability, Cheese & tree surgery

Planning the multi-choice test next week, Gil pointed out I'll have to make special provision for Stephen who has a disability. Was surprised that I hadn't had any notification about Stephen's special needs - or any others likely to be in this 70+ class. Not sure where this info is meant to come from.

Talking to Gary the other day he told me about his sister (a lecturer) who used the technique of calling out names from the register and asking people for their opinion. I tried it in a MKT1002 seminar group - the first girl wouldn't admit who she was - I didn't push it, called out a different name instead - this time he answered - and it was fine - plus helped me to know who it was. Might try it again - not sure if too confrontational.

Had a good MKT2003 late session - one of my favourite groups. It was a case study, but I used the white board more CSI Miami this time - pulling in a definition of the Hawthorne Effect from the net, pictures of cheese and tree surgeons. 6 students are defecting from the Friday group into this session - all a good crowd.

Have picked up some eggs to demonstrate the hen tracking thing M&S do for my sustainability lecture. I can't decide whether the impact is worth the effort of taking eggs to work!

Jacky sent me a cool video about the necessity of being 'remarkable'.

Tuesday, 19 October 2010

Seminars seminars seminars

Well... case study practice I wanted, case study practice I got!

Tuesdays I do MKT1001 and MKT1002 over and over ... and this week we had the a Mintel smoothie sector report for Comms, and Specsavers for Foundations....

...and they both went well. Why?

MKT1002 Smoothie Sector
I started by spelling out how they should be engaging with the seminar material to go into their assignment portfolio. Di was right - mention assessment and they get right to work! Discussions went well, familiarity with material all fine.

MKT1001 Specsavers
Started with a few ads to get everyone having an opinion - helps that they are funny. Icebreaker. Maybe that's what I need each time? Then we did PESTLE... have done quite a lot of this before. For once the material also looked OK. This makes a difference for me. Must remember that if I get something tatty again.

Talked to Sally about my slides. She talked about learning dimensions... realise my style won't suit everyone in class. Do they get enough didactic stuff or should I be done a mix?

Then I spoke to Gary - was delighted to hear that he shared my views on
a) slide design - visual aid not the whole story
b) posting slides before lectures - blows the reveal
This was a relief. No saying he's right though.